Boise City Wire

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho), ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, criticized the Biden Administration's new arms transfer policy, calling it shortsighted and potentially detrimental to the United States and its allies. In a statement released today, Risch expressed concern over the prioritization of political appeasement over national security.

Risch highlighted the burdensome reporting requirements of the new policy, stating that they would only add layers of red tape and further slow down the delivery of security assistance to partner countries. He emphasized that human rights considerations have always been an important factor in security assistance decisions, as seen in previous administrations. However, Risch believes that the Biden Administration's new policy misses the mark, stating that it is "anti-Israel" and raises doubts about the reliability of the administration.

The senator also drew attention to the administration's failure to consult with the relevant congressional committees prior to implementing the new policy, which he sees as a blatant disregard for the role of Congress. Risch had previously urged the Secretary of State to return to regular order in terms of consultations related to the arms transfer process, and he expressed disappointment that the administration did not uphold this commitment.

Risch's concerns echo those of other lawmakers who have criticized the Biden Administration's approach to national security. The administration's recent withdrawal from Afghanistan, delays in security assistance to Ukraine, and the incident involving a Chinese balloon have raised questions about its decision-making process and its commitment to the country's allies.

As discussions over the arms transfer policy continue, it remains to be seen how the Biden Administration will address the concerns raised by Senator Risch and other lawmakers. The delicate balance between human rights considerations and national security interests will undoubtedly be a point of contention, requiring thoughtful and careful decision-making.